Obama administration to cut back its anti-gay activities a little.

Attorney General Eric Holder has announced that, the President having concluded that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional, the Department of Justice will no longer defend Section 3 in court.

DOMA has two main parts: Section 2, which nullifies the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution with regard to same-sex marriage, meaning no state is obligated to recognize any same-sex marriage that takes place in another state, and Section 3, which nullifies all same-sex marriages with regard to federal law. It’s the latter, and the latter only, which the DOJ now acknowledges to be unconstitutional. The administration will, of course, continue to enforce Section 3.

Holder’s statement included a pro forma declaration that Obama “opposes” DOMA, though of course he has never done any such thing. He has repeatedly stated his opposition to same-sex marriage, and until today has vigorously defended DOMA in court. While saying it “should be repealed,” he has never made the slightest move to encourage Congress to repeal it. On the contrary, his administration has made it abundantly clear that he has no wish to see it repealed anytime soon. Despite Obama’s lip service to equality, he has supported DOMA until today and continues to support it, having belatedly decided — now that there is no possibility of Congressional repeal during the remainder of his term — to mitigate his support somewhat.

Excuse me if I don’t share the gushing enthusiasm of many in the LGBT community.

Anything less than full equality under the law is still unacceptable. Justice delayed is still justice denied. If and when Obama finally understands that, and acts on it, he will become the fierce advocate he promised to be.

This entry was posted in Civil Rights, LGBT, Politics and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Obama administration to cut back its anti-gay activities a little.

  1. You’re right — anything less than full equality is unacceptable. That being said, Obama’s stand does seem like a big deal. Maybe it’s political maneuvering but I’d like to believe it took some courage and integrity. It really could pave the way to full equality.

    Obama certainly alienated a chunk of voters (not that many on the right were big Obama supporters anyway) but I can respect him for that. It seems to me that the GOP is so polarized and irrational, particularly after the November election. In light of that Obama’s position on this issue seems more than politically risky. It feels more like the right thing to do.

  2. The DV8 says:

    I wouldn’t say it’s the right thing to do. It’s less egregiously wrong.

  3. Ahab says:

    On a positive note, Sen. Diane Feinstein announced that she will introduce legislation to repeal DOMA.


    • The DV8 says:

      I doubt it’ll go far, especially with a Republican majority in the House. But I give Senator Feinstein credit for being one of only 14 senators to vote against DOMA in 1996 — unlike Joe Biden and Harry Reid, both of whom voted for it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s